01 May 2013

Letter from a Cubs' Fan to Tom Ricketts Regarding the Proposed Changes to Wrigley Field and the Chicago Cubs

Tom Ricketts, Chairman of the Chicago Cubs
Dear Sir,

I am writing this letter regarding your proposed changes to Wrigley Field and the Chicago Cubs in general. I wish with all my heart you would reconsider.
Firstly, part of the charm of Wrigley Field consists in it's age and the sense of history attached to it. It has been slow to change with the changing years and that is one thing I love about it. (And not just myself, but Cubs' fans world over.) I remember well the first year I had the privilege of watching a Cubs game at Wrigley Field: it was in July 2007, and they were playing the St. Louis Cardinals. I immediately fell in love with the look and feel of the ballpark; the towering columns, the outfield ivy, the breeze off Lake Michigan, the wide open feel of the place. All of the other ballparks I have been to have been very modernized, with advertising everywhere and jumbo TV's flashing distractions constantly. I hated it. Wrigley Field does not have these things and implementing them would ruin the look and feel of the place, and hurt me very much.
Secondly, you claim the team needs the revenue that these advertisements etc. would generate. You claim we have to catch up to our large-market competitors in revenue. According to USAToday, CBS sports, and several other sources, the Cubs current payroll is $104,150,726. This is twice Tampa Bay's, who have sent a team to the World Series twice in recent years. The Cubs have bought several high-profile players recently and had plenty of money to do it (most notably, the highly toted free agent Alfonso Soriano). Wrigley Field is sold out almost every single game-- with tens of thousands flocking to the ballpark even on weekday afternoon games. What exactly does the team need more revenue for?
And lastly, you claim you want to modernize the club even more by adding more evening games into the schedule. Yet there is no shortage of fans even on afternoon games, and the tradition of afternoon games is deeply rooted in the Cubs history; it is an endearing part of a club that clings to old-school traditions. I am proud that Wrigley Field was the last ballpark to get lights, and that they play more afternoon games than any other team. I love that about them, I do not want that to change. I don't want the Cubs to become more “modern”! What I love so much about them is that they are one of the last ball teams who have refused all of the changes and the rush to become “modern.”
I beg that you would reconsider. I do not believe these changes are in the best interests of the Cubs or their fans. I think the things you wish to change are some of the very things that endear this team and ballpark to their fans, and you would do wrong to take those away.

Sincerely,
A Cubs' Fan

No comments:

Post a Comment